30.12.04
28.12.04
News in brief
Chicago Tribune
As the world is struck by waves of generosity in response to the tsunamis which have killed over 50,000 peoples, American corporations are gearing up their checkbooks for the quatrannual Bush inauguration festivities. For all of $250,000 dollars one's company is privy to dinners with the president, ceremonies to salute those who serve, and 9 formal balls. While the $40 million plus price tag is a bit expensive, one must remember that it is only through events like this that we fully honor our troops and their committments to spreading freedom, liberty, and mcdonalds all over the globe.
As the world is struck by waves of generosity in response to the tsunamis which have killed over 50,000 peoples, American corporations are gearing up their checkbooks for the quatrannual Bush inauguration festivities. For all of $250,000 dollars one's company is privy to dinners with the president, ceremonies to salute those who serve, and 9 formal balls. While the $40 million plus price tag is a bit expensive, one must remember that it is only through events like this that we fully honor our troops and their committments to spreading freedom, liberty, and mcdonalds all over the globe.
27.12.04
22.12.04
21.12.04
Fuck you East Coast
Who are the nation's 'cheapstates'? Try the blue ones. | csmonitor.com
Guess who's going to heaven? On Jesus' account of the poor woman and her bronze, I'd say the red states.
Guess who's going to heaven? On Jesus' account of the poor woman and her bronze, I'd say the red states.
Just pretend like you don't see it, that's what CNN is doing
BBC NEWS | Americas | New jail abuse allegations hit US
Yep, more prisoner abuse... more ignorance on the part of the American media. Rock on journalism... Rock on.
Yep, more prisoner abuse... more ignorance on the part of the American media. Rock on journalism... Rock on.
Does anyone else not give a shit?
CNN.com - Fetus suspect, victim attended dog show - Dec 21, 2004
Ok... this story has been chilling on the front page of CNN for about 4 days now. Yesterday they had a picture of the disgusting looking lady gracing their bloody front page... Now the Dad talks about a dog show to reporters... DOES ANYONE GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT THIS KANSAS HICKS?
Now, I suppose calling them hicks is a little out of line... but, I think I'd rather be a hick then an east coast douche bag. At least hicks don't know any better, where as our east coast douche bags are fully aware that they're god's greatest gift to humanity and America in particular (in between their pluralistic hypocracies of everyone's opinion is equal).
But all that is rather besides the point... as for the fourth day in a row (I might be wrong on the number issue) all I've bloody seen is a bunch of stories repeating the single story that has already broke... there's no more investigative journalism to do... we know what happened... the bitch got sliced, the child stolen, the other bitch arrested... woo ah. Now, maybe you'd like to cover some other issues... like what's the administration doing about Iraqi elections, what this social security reform actually entails, why Darfur peace talks are currently inbalanced and CNN hasn't reported on it, THE FACT THAT WE HAVE NEW JAIL ABUSE AT GITMO BEING MADE PUBLIC IN A SUIT FILED BY THE ACLU... seriously people.
Ok... this story has been chilling on the front page of CNN for about 4 days now. Yesterday they had a picture of the disgusting looking lady gracing their bloody front page... Now the Dad talks about a dog show to reporters... DOES ANYONE GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT THIS KANSAS HICKS?
Now, I suppose calling them hicks is a little out of line... but, I think I'd rather be a hick then an east coast douche bag. At least hicks don't know any better, where as our east coast douche bags are fully aware that they're god's greatest gift to humanity and America in particular (in between their pluralistic hypocracies of everyone's opinion is equal).
But all that is rather besides the point... as for the fourth day in a row (I might be wrong on the number issue) all I've bloody seen is a bunch of stories repeating the single story that has already broke... there's no more investigative journalism to do... we know what happened... the bitch got sliced, the child stolen, the other bitch arrested... woo ah. Now, maybe you'd like to cover some other issues... like what's the administration doing about Iraqi elections, what this social security reform actually entails, why Darfur peace talks are currently inbalanced and CNN hasn't reported on it, THE FACT THAT WE HAVE NEW JAIL ABUSE AT GITMO BEING MADE PUBLIC IN A SUIT FILED BY THE ACLU... seriously people.
BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | The right to be downright offensive
BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | The right to be downright offensive: "Only last week, the comedian Rowan Atkinson led a call defending 'the right to offend', against government plans to outlaw incitement to religious hatred.
Atkinson argues the law would force 'creative thinkers' to bite their tongue, and so produce a 'veneer of tolerance concealing a snakepit of unaired and unchallenged views'. "
Atkinson argues the law would force 'creative thinkers' to bite their tongue, and so produce a 'veneer of tolerance concealing a snakepit of unaired and unchallenged views'. "
CNN, Thanks for all the great coverage
CNN.com - Survey:�Are you a�mall parking lot stalker? - Dec 21, 2004
Worried about what type of mall parker you might? Take the CNN quiz and find out. From the folks that brought you "Hey, Let's Fuck up Iraq." and "The Government Says They Didn't Do It, and They Are an Official Source." Now find out just how effective your mall parking skills are and what you can do to improve them.
Worried about what type of mall parker you might? Take the CNN quiz and find out. From the folks that brought you "Hey, Let's Fuck up Iraq." and "The Government Says They Didn't Do It, and They Are an Official Source." Now find out just how effective your mall parking skills are and what you can do to improve them.
Winning the vote on values
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | US faces new torture claims: Asked about Guantánamo at a news conference yesterday, Mr Bush said, "'You've got to understand the dilemma we're in. These are people that got scooped up off a battlefield attempting to kill US troops. And I want to make sure, before they're released, that they don't come back to kill again.'"
Those damn illiterate Afghani farmers... just never know when they might buy a plane ticket to New York and blow the whole bloody place up.
Those damn illiterate Afghani farmers... just never know when they might buy a plane ticket to New York and blow the whole bloody place up.
20.12.04
Just in case you'd like to know how you feel...
CNN.com - Poll: Rumsfeld losing public's support - Dec 20, 2004
As Americans, its good to be told how you think, feel, look, and act. With the prevelance of advertising and polls, we can live the life without even lifting our ass off the couch to find out how we actually think, feel, look, and act.
As Americans, its good to be told how you think, feel, look, and act. With the prevelance of advertising and polls, we can live the life without even lifting our ass off the couch to find out how we actually think, feel, look, and act.
We don't take kindly to none of that old stuff round here
Second term near, Bush takes stock | csmonitor.com: "The current Social Security system was designed in 'another era,' said Bush."
A member of the press corp followed up and reminded the president that the Constitution of the United States was written in another era as well, at which point the president replied, "That was part of my first term's agenda."
A member of the press corp followed up and reminded the president that the Constitution of the United States was written in another era as well, at which point the president replied, "That was part of my first term's agenda."
State of the Economy
Stock market back in the game, modestly | csmonitor.com
The feelings, both optimistic and pessimistic, about stock market confuse me. Generally speaking, they're short term opinions, as no one seems to be all that concerned about the long term holding. It's assumed that the market will exist, high or low, and what matters is high or low in the next few quarters to perhaps the next few years. Most market analysts who are either working for, or are seeking to work for, the major financial institutions feel that with the New Deal banking reforms etc., we don't have to worry about another Black Thursday. However, they fail to address the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they base their analyses.
Now, although stock prices and company worth are valued according to a number of criteria including profits, earnings, dividends, social issues, company management etc., the fundamental assest, the lowest common denominator of production, are the resources used. Sure human technology and reason have created some well run businesses and some kick ass products, but they all come down to basic resources used to make those products. Although we currently seem to be doing okay insofar as resources are concerned at the present, its clear that fifteen years down the road, that won't be the case.
World oil production has more or less peaked. Although we might still be pumping it fifty years down the road, the barrels pumped per day is likely to trend downward. Agriculturally, the science which provides us food, we're in even deeper shit. The main resouviour of fresh water in the United States, buried deep beneath the Plains States, is running on a quarter tank. Worldwide, thanks to the shifting weather patterns caused or not by global warming, drought is becoming a regular deal. Many southeast Asian and African nations have been dealing with this phenomenon for years and parts of the United States are beginning to encounter it as well. Without clean, fresh water, we will be unable to provide the luxuriant amount of food, and in particular meat, which we as americans have grown to expect (meat is extremely expensive to produce in terms of the amount of grain (and land to grow that grain) it takes to feed one animal). Forests are also becoming scarce, though the current administration is doing its best to open up remaining national forests to logging companies.
At times I'm sure I sound rather eschatological, which I suppose I am. However, there are methods by which we can minimize the damage that the oncoming disasters are sure to cause. Namely, withdrawing our money from the stock market and hurrying its collapse. No doubt, Bush in office will do his best to bring the country down from within, which is probably a good thing. The higher we climb, the further we'll fall.
The feelings, both optimistic and pessimistic, about stock market confuse me. Generally speaking, they're short term opinions, as no one seems to be all that concerned about the long term holding. It's assumed that the market will exist, high or low, and what matters is high or low in the next few quarters to perhaps the next few years. Most market analysts who are either working for, or are seeking to work for, the major financial institutions feel that with the New Deal banking reforms etc., we don't have to worry about another Black Thursday. However, they fail to address the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they base their analyses.
Now, although stock prices and company worth are valued according to a number of criteria including profits, earnings, dividends, social issues, company management etc., the fundamental assest, the lowest common denominator of production, are the resources used. Sure human technology and reason have created some well run businesses and some kick ass products, but they all come down to basic resources used to make those products. Although we currently seem to be doing okay insofar as resources are concerned at the present, its clear that fifteen years down the road, that won't be the case.
World oil production has more or less peaked. Although we might still be pumping it fifty years down the road, the barrels pumped per day is likely to trend downward. Agriculturally, the science which provides us food, we're in even deeper shit. The main resouviour of fresh water in the United States, buried deep beneath the Plains States, is running on a quarter tank. Worldwide, thanks to the shifting weather patterns caused or not by global warming, drought is becoming a regular deal. Many southeast Asian and African nations have been dealing with this phenomenon for years and parts of the United States are beginning to encounter it as well. Without clean, fresh water, we will be unable to provide the luxuriant amount of food, and in particular meat, which we as americans have grown to expect (meat is extremely expensive to produce in terms of the amount of grain (and land to grow that grain) it takes to feed one animal). Forests are also becoming scarce, though the current administration is doing its best to open up remaining national forests to logging companies.
At times I'm sure I sound rather eschatological, which I suppose I am. However, there are methods by which we can minimize the damage that the oncoming disasters are sure to cause. Namely, withdrawing our money from the stock market and hurrying its collapse. No doubt, Bush in office will do his best to bring the country down from within, which is probably a good thing. The higher we climb, the further we'll fall.
19.12.04
FOXNews... heh
FOXNews.com - U.S. & World - Muslim Extremists Preach Violence in Europe: "Abu Hamza (search), who lost two hands and an eye in Afghanistan, is in jail now but other extremists from among Britain's two million Muslims continue to preach violence, veiling the message to take advantage of some of Europe's most liberal freedom-of-speech laws.
'We cannot tolerate a crocodile in our bedroom,' said Sheik Omar Bakri. 'U.S. forces in Muslim countries are crocodiles in our bedrooms. So we are not going to give them ice cream.'"
Apparently "Preaching violence" involves not wanting to give ice cream to the people who just raided your cousin's house last tuesday dealt with him and his family S.S. style. Bastards.
'We cannot tolerate a crocodile in our bedroom,' said Sheik Omar Bakri. 'U.S. forces in Muslim countries are crocodiles in our bedrooms. So we are not going to give them ice cream.'"
Apparently "Preaching violence" involves not wanting to give ice cream to the people who just raided your cousin's house last tuesday dealt with him and his family S.S. style. Bastards.
High government official, recently deposed accused of being a bully
Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | Blunkett: I'm a working class victim of the rich
'The guy was a bully,' said the source. 'That isn't to say he didn't have some personal charm, but people were almost frightened of him.'
Yep... that definately earns a pink slip in my book. If you don't respect the feelings of your employees every step of the way, who will? It's your responsibility as a manager to spend time bitching people about to the tasks that they'd zone out of doing, but in a kind and gentle fashion.
'The guy was a bully,' said the source. 'That isn't to say he didn't have some personal charm, but people were almost frightened of him.'
Yep... that definately earns a pink slip in my book. If you don't respect the feelings of your employees every step of the way, who will? It's your responsibility as a manager to spend time bitching people about to the tasks that they'd zone out of doing, but in a kind and gentle fashion.
18.12.04
Law rocks
SignOnSanDiego.com > News > Politics -- Frye camp dealt setback; call to count disputed ballots denied
Fill in the oval and be sure to make your mark heavy and dark. If you don't, and say, just write in a candidates name, we're gonna assume that you really didn't want to vote.
So remember kids, the letter of the law is always more important than the spirit of the law, because you can always second guess the spirit of the law, where you can only bend the letter of the law. Unless, of course, the spirit of the law is more important to the people currently in control of the law, in which case the letter of the law should obviously have been written differently, the people who wrote the law just got sloppy.
Fill in the oval and be sure to make your mark heavy and dark. If you don't, and say, just write in a candidates name, we're gonna assume that you really didn't want to vote.
So remember kids, the letter of the law is always more important than the spirit of the law, because you can always second guess the spirit of the law, where you can only bend the letter of the law. Unless, of course, the spirit of the law is more important to the people currently in control of the law, in which case the letter of the law should obviously have been written differently, the people who wrote the law just got sloppy.
That's how we do it.
Aljazeera.Net - US threatening UN over Arab report
U.S. actions once again demonstrate the infinitesmal gap between how things would function in the ideal world and how they actually function in the real world. The UN agency in charge of writing a report which asks the questions, "What's fucked up in the Arabic world, why's it fucked up, and what the fuck can we do to fix it?," is feeling pressure from the United States to make the report more correct. Researched and compiled by over 100 experts on the Arab world, no doubt left wing academics and so called intellectuals, the report is said to grossly misrepresent huge swaths of United States foreign policy. The United States is stepping in and calling upon the agency to mend their biased ways. They have noted that not one United States government official was called upon to tell them what its really like on the ground in the Arab world. As such, funding for the agency is being threatened and rightly so. People around the world often forget that we in America, thanks to our geographic isolation, are really the only people distanced enough from the situation to see it clearly. Academics and experts on the subject are way too involved to be able to provide an honest and objective analysis, whereas the United States government, having not devoted any time to the issues at all, really has a vantage point from which to provide non-subjective, value based edicts.
U.S. actions once again demonstrate the infinitesmal gap between how things would function in the ideal world and how they actually function in the real world. The UN agency in charge of writing a report which asks the questions, "What's fucked up in the Arabic world, why's it fucked up, and what the fuck can we do to fix it?," is feeling pressure from the United States to make the report more correct. Researched and compiled by over 100 experts on the Arab world, no doubt left wing academics and so called intellectuals, the report is said to grossly misrepresent huge swaths of United States foreign policy. The United States is stepping in and calling upon the agency to mend their biased ways. They have noted that not one United States government official was called upon to tell them what its really like on the ground in the Arab world. As such, funding for the agency is being threatened and rightly so. People around the world often forget that we in America, thanks to our geographic isolation, are really the only people distanced enough from the situation to see it clearly. Academics and experts on the subject are way too involved to be able to provide an honest and objective analysis, whereas the United States government, having not devoted any time to the issues at all, really has a vantage point from which to provide non-subjective, value based edicts.
Liberties all around
Aljazeera.Net - US poll supports crackdown on Muslims
Rock on civil liberties... I beleive you still exist... kinda... for a little while at least.
Rock on civil liberties... I beleive you still exist... kinda... for a little while at least.
17.12.04
Interesting article on Iraq...
Aljazeera.Net - The risks of the al-Zarqawi myth
I highly suggest this article... by Scott Ritter, a senior UN arms inspector in Iraq from 91-98.
I highly suggest this article... by Scott Ritter, a senior UN arms inspector in Iraq from 91-98.
A little history of Christmas...
Christmas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd suggest reading through the article to get an idea about the cultural significance of Christmas, or at least the celebration associated with that immeadiate time of the year, but I'm just gonna post some of my favorites.
"It is an appropriation by early Christians of a day on which the birth of several pagan gods, Osiris, Jupiter, and Plutus, or the ancient deified leader Nimrod, was celebrated.
It is an appropriation of the pagan Midwinter festivals, such as the Germanic Yule and the Roman festival of the birth of Unconquered Sun, celebrated on the day after the winter solstice, or the Roman festival of Saturnalia.
It derives from the tradition that Jesus was born during the Jewish Festival of Lights (Hanukkah, the 25th of Kislev and the beginning of Tevet). Kislev is generally accepted as corresponding with our December. Under the Old Julian calendar, the popular choice of 5 BC for the year of Jesus's birth would place the 25th of Kislev on the 25th of November.
Non-Christians in predominantly Christian nations may be left bereft of entertainment around Christmas, as stores close and friends depart for vacations. The cliché recreation for them is "movies and Chinese food"; movie theaters remaining open to bring in holiday box office dollars and Chinese (and presumably Buddhist, et al.) establishments being less likely to close for the "big day".
2 The 8th century English historian Bede's Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum ("Ecclesiastic History of the English People") contains a letter from Pope Gregory I to Saint Mellitus, who was then on his way to England to conduct missionary work among the heathen Anglo-Saxons. The Pope suggests that converting heathens is easier if they are allowed to retain the outward forms of their traditional pagan practices and traditions, while recasting those traditions spiritually towards the one true God instead of to their pagan gods (whom the Pope refers to as "devils"), "to the end that, whilst some gratifications are outwardly permitted them, they may the more easily consent to the inward consolations of the grace of God". [1] (http://www.englishheathenism.homestead.com/popesletter.html) The Pope sanctions such conversion tactics as Biblically acceptable, pointing out that God did much the same thing with the ancient Israelites and their pagan sacrifices.
3 When Oliver Cromwell took over England in 1645, Christmas was cancelled as part of a Puritan effort to rid the country of decadence. This proved unpopular, and when Charles II was restored to the throne, he restored the celebration. The Pilgrims, a group of Puritanical English separatists who came to North America in 1620, also disapproved of Christmas, and as a result it was not a holiday in early America. The celebration of Christmas was actually outlawed from 1659 to 1681 in Boston, a prohibition enforced with a fine of five shillings. The people of the Jamestown settlement, on the other hand, celebrated the occasion freely. Christmas fell out of favor again after the American Revolution, as it was considered an "English custom", and it was not declared a federal holiday in the United States until June 26, 1870. "
Just saying, its part of our cultural heritage. While I in no way beleive that it should be used to maliciously hurt people, it should most definately be a holiday. Back in the ancient times communities came together for festivals, and if there was a minority religious community there, unless ascetic in nature, it would more than likely take part.
Now, Pagan Rome had festivals which all were welcome to celebrate. Even if Athena was your goddess, you still celebrated they days of the other gods. Hell, there were sacrifices, you got to eat some meat. Lots of drinking and comradery.
The Christians wanted to establish an identity seperate from the pagans, which is why they were an exclusive sect. You had to be a member to really take part. The Jews also maintained their identity through shared cultural practices and holidays.
However, our nation is unsure of its footing right now. Jung and the line of thought he spawned forced many on the left to withdraw to quietism and nuturing. We were so aware of our own thoughts and what offended us, that we figured everyone else was offended by the same types of things.
What psychology has taught us, and what we'll need to get a grip on soon, is that what was needed was a more nuturing attitude to our immeadiate family and friends, our children most of all, not to the rest of the mother fucking world.
The left went to one side, the right to the other. Karl Rove's engineered victories are no more than the balancing of the world. Where we had one of the most powerful forces of care for the world (As can be seen in Clinton's years) flip into one of the most powerful forces caring only for itself.
Scales have grown in the eyes of the left, a side effect of the unsafe and unneccesary drugs they're selling us. Selling it to us only because of the satisfaction we get from purchasing it. Our addiction has gotten bad, and we're slowly starting to figure it out... we just dont know what to do about it.
When I use the words left and right, I don't necessarily beleive it refers to republicans and democrats. Though there certainly is alot of overlap between the categories. Left, in my lexicon, really refers to all the people working somehow, someway, and actively putting effort into bringing this society back in line. Morally, Culturally, Socially, and Politically. People who use non-exclusive methods to help build this society back from the ground-up. The Right, of course, refers to their current opponents: those who want to keep society as divided as all possible, either destroying or polarizing public discourse. And there are no doubt all sorts of people floating in between, favoring one side or the other.
Christmas, my friends, is a community event. It's a bloody American event. It's a bloody European event. It's a bloody astrological event. If your religion excludes you from taking part in it, than by all means, fulfill your obligation to God and accept it as a sacrifice. If it doesn't, offer up a toast to old J.C and indulge in a little merrimaking. For Christ's sake man. ;)
Which reminds me... if God is dead, why can't we worship someone else's god for a day... not like anyone's gonna care, you've already disowned yours.
I'd suggest reading through the article to get an idea about the cultural significance of Christmas, or at least the celebration associated with that immeadiate time of the year, but I'm just gonna post some of my favorites.
"It is an appropriation by early Christians of a day on which the birth of several pagan gods, Osiris, Jupiter, and Plutus, or the ancient deified leader Nimrod, was celebrated.
It is an appropriation of the pagan Midwinter festivals, such as the Germanic Yule and the Roman festival of the birth of Unconquered Sun, celebrated on the day after the winter solstice, or the Roman festival of Saturnalia.
It derives from the tradition that Jesus was born during the Jewish Festival of Lights (Hanukkah, the 25th of Kislev and the beginning of Tevet). Kislev is generally accepted as corresponding with our December. Under the Old Julian calendar, the popular choice of 5 BC for the year of Jesus's birth would place the 25th of Kislev on the 25th of November.
Non-Christians in predominantly Christian nations may be left bereft of entertainment around Christmas, as stores close and friends depart for vacations. The cliché recreation for them is "movies and Chinese food"; movie theaters remaining open to bring in holiday box office dollars and Chinese (and presumably Buddhist, et al.) establishments being less likely to close for the "big day".
2 The 8th century English historian Bede's Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum ("Ecclesiastic History of the English People") contains a letter from Pope Gregory I to Saint Mellitus, who was then on his way to England to conduct missionary work among the heathen Anglo-Saxons. The Pope suggests that converting heathens is easier if they are allowed to retain the outward forms of their traditional pagan practices and traditions, while recasting those traditions spiritually towards the one true God instead of to their pagan gods (whom the Pope refers to as "devils"), "to the end that, whilst some gratifications are outwardly permitted them, they may the more easily consent to the inward consolations of the grace of God". [1] (http://www.englishheathenism.homestead.com/popesletter.html) The Pope sanctions such conversion tactics as Biblically acceptable, pointing out that God did much the same thing with the ancient Israelites and their pagan sacrifices.
3 When Oliver Cromwell took over England in 1645, Christmas was cancelled as part of a Puritan effort to rid the country of decadence. This proved unpopular, and when Charles II was restored to the throne, he restored the celebration. The Pilgrims, a group of Puritanical English separatists who came to North America in 1620, also disapproved of Christmas, and as a result it was not a holiday in early America. The celebration of Christmas was actually outlawed from 1659 to 1681 in Boston, a prohibition enforced with a fine of five shillings. The people of the Jamestown settlement, on the other hand, celebrated the occasion freely. Christmas fell out of favor again after the American Revolution, as it was considered an "English custom", and it was not declared a federal holiday in the United States until June 26, 1870. "
Just saying, its part of our cultural heritage. While I in no way beleive that it should be used to maliciously hurt people, it should most definately be a holiday. Back in the ancient times communities came together for festivals, and if there was a minority religious community there, unless ascetic in nature, it would more than likely take part.
Now, Pagan Rome had festivals which all were welcome to celebrate. Even if Athena was your goddess, you still celebrated they days of the other gods. Hell, there were sacrifices, you got to eat some meat. Lots of drinking and comradery.
The Christians wanted to establish an identity seperate from the pagans, which is why they were an exclusive sect. You had to be a member to really take part. The Jews also maintained their identity through shared cultural practices and holidays.
However, our nation is unsure of its footing right now. Jung and the line of thought he spawned forced many on the left to withdraw to quietism and nuturing. We were so aware of our own thoughts and what offended us, that we figured everyone else was offended by the same types of things.
What psychology has taught us, and what we'll need to get a grip on soon, is that what was needed was a more nuturing attitude to our immeadiate family and friends, our children most of all, not to the rest of the mother fucking world.
The left went to one side, the right to the other. Karl Rove's engineered victories are no more than the balancing of the world. Where we had one of the most powerful forces of care for the world (As can be seen in Clinton's years) flip into one of the most powerful forces caring only for itself.
Scales have grown in the eyes of the left, a side effect of the unsafe and unneccesary drugs they're selling us. Selling it to us only because of the satisfaction we get from purchasing it. Our addiction has gotten bad, and we're slowly starting to figure it out... we just dont know what to do about it.
When I use the words left and right, I don't necessarily beleive it refers to republicans and democrats. Though there certainly is alot of overlap between the categories. Left, in my lexicon, really refers to all the people working somehow, someway, and actively putting effort into bringing this society back in line. Morally, Culturally, Socially, and Politically. People who use non-exclusive methods to help build this society back from the ground-up. The Right, of course, refers to their current opponents: those who want to keep society as divided as all possible, either destroying or polarizing public discourse. And there are no doubt all sorts of people floating in between, favoring one side or the other.
Christmas, my friends, is a community event. It's a bloody American event. It's a bloody European event. It's a bloody astrological event. If your religion excludes you from taking part in it, than by all means, fulfill your obligation to God and accept it as a sacrifice. If it doesn't, offer up a toast to old J.C and indulge in a little merrimaking. For Christ's sake man. ;)
Which reminds me... if God is dead, why can't we worship someone else's god for a day... not like anyone's gonna care, you've already disowned yours.
Hey, Fuck you
BBC NEWS | Americas | Cuba counters US Christmas lights
Cuba and America rocked a friendly exchange of "Fuck You"s today over Christmas lights and nudie photos. More specifically "75" screaming out in bright neon next to Santa Claus (in reference to the 75 Cuban political dissidents arrested in March 2003), and a vivid mural of Abu Ghraib vacation photos. Tis' the season to be jolly.
Cuba and America rocked a friendly exchange of "Fuck You"s today over Christmas lights and nudie photos. More specifically "75" screaming out in bright neon next to Santa Claus (in reference to the 75 Cuban political dissidents arrested in March 2003), and a vivid mural of Abu Ghraib vacation photos. Tis' the season to be jolly.
16.12.04
The Modern Day Tower of Babel
In schools and cities, battles over 'Christ' in Christmas | csmonitor.com
Christmas time is upon us once again, and what a better time for secular pluralists arrogant with the knowledge that everyone's opinion is equal (except for theirs, which is better) and whacko Christian right wingers to clash over public discourse. How exactly should we approach this holiday through our public and corporate displays? Is it a breach of seperation of Church and State to have "Merry Christmas" cards sent out from City Hall? Should those words be forbidden in our public discourse as well, in favor of the more culturally sensitive "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings"? Are people that fucking stupid?
Let's lay down a few assumptions...
A) 95% percent of Americans celebrate Christmas
B) The meaning of Christmas has, due to an attack on emphasizing the religious intentions, been bought and sold by the corporate world in the hopes of higher 4th quarter profits.
C) Kwanza is a cultural festival... kinda like Christopher Colombus day. Except, instead of the celebration of another conquest of White Europeans, it is a celebration of a forced migration common to people spanning an entire continent.
D) We gave the Jewish people Isreal in 1954, if they want majority treatment they can move there.
E) Islam doesn't actually recognize a holiday this time of year as their calendar is lunar rather than solar.
F) AMERICA IS FUCKING CHRISTIAN
Now, the neat thing about cultures is they're happy pushing their own ideology. Whereas some might argue that that's a bad thing because it doesn't allow for the full expression of other cultures, they're actually wrong. America has been designed to allow you to express your own culture however you damn well see fit. America hasn't been designed to provide the grounds by which your own culture is on equal footing with the culture previously established herein. Read, majority rule, minority rights. I most definately agree with the premise of seperation of Church and State, but I'm quite sure that the Founders (God bless them every one) were more concerned with institutional seperation of Church and State. That is, our country shouldn't be run as a subsidiary of Rome. Their concern was not so much of a cultural concern, as a political concern. While the political reinforcement of a cultural theme (such as Christmas) will likely strengthen the force of that theme within the culture, it will fail, in even its most forceful expression, to trample upon the rights of those who do not find refuge in theme. If we would say to our citizens, "you must decorate your house with Christmas lights or you will become a Christmas light", that would be a violation of the seperation of church and state. However, on the other hand, if we would even say to our citizens, "Please drive safely this Christmas," all we're doing is giving them some practical advice while reinforcing a cultural theme.
Now, you may ask, what is the speak of Babel? Isn't that a Bible story? And who are you to quote the Bible, you might hurt someone's feelings. My answer is that you're probably a dumb peice of shit stripped of your cultural heritage by parents overly caught up in the movement of pluralistic relativism. The primary role of holidays like Christmas, Halloween, and Martin Luther King Jr. day, as well as cultural themes such as the English language, capitalism, and even yellow school buses, is to provide a common set of beliefs and assumptions which unite the culture of which they're a part. I may not speak the English language in my home, but if I hope to communicate with other Americans I need to recourse to this shared set of tropes. Relativistic pluralism, secular humanistic theory, and those damn hippies have helped create a culture which is defined solely by its refusal to recognize this shared cultural themes. They destroy the platform which allows to communicate equally. Ebonics, for instance, creates two distinct sets of people in America: people who speak Ebonics and people who speak queen's bloody English. Their connection is severed and communication is that much more difficult between each camp. These movements are doing their best to destroy every single peice of culture which unites Americans in order that noone's feelings should be bloody hurt.
Fuck them.
Continue on this path and real, emphatic communication will be all but impossible. Our tower to God through "democracy" and "freedom" will be all but shattered, let to suffer the fate of Ozymandias, lying in the desert created by global warming.
Whacko Christian right wingers... I'm with you on this one.
Christmas time is upon us once again, and what a better time for secular pluralists arrogant with the knowledge that everyone's opinion is equal (except for theirs, which is better) and whacko Christian right wingers to clash over public discourse. How exactly should we approach this holiday through our public and corporate displays? Is it a breach of seperation of Church and State to have "Merry Christmas" cards sent out from City Hall? Should those words be forbidden in our public discourse as well, in favor of the more culturally sensitive "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings"? Are people that fucking stupid?
Let's lay down a few assumptions...
A) 95% percent of Americans celebrate Christmas
B) The meaning of Christmas has, due to an attack on emphasizing the religious intentions, been bought and sold by the corporate world in the hopes of higher 4th quarter profits.
C) Kwanza is a cultural festival... kinda like Christopher Colombus day. Except, instead of the celebration of another conquest of White Europeans, it is a celebration of a forced migration common to people spanning an entire continent.
D) We gave the Jewish people Isreal in 1954, if they want majority treatment they can move there.
E) Islam doesn't actually recognize a holiday this time of year as their calendar is lunar rather than solar.
F) AMERICA IS FUCKING CHRISTIAN
Now, the neat thing about cultures is they're happy pushing their own ideology. Whereas some might argue that that's a bad thing because it doesn't allow for the full expression of other cultures, they're actually wrong. America has been designed to allow you to express your own culture however you damn well see fit. America hasn't been designed to provide the grounds by which your own culture is on equal footing with the culture previously established herein. Read, majority rule, minority rights. I most definately agree with the premise of seperation of Church and State, but I'm quite sure that the Founders (God bless them every one) were more concerned with institutional seperation of Church and State. That is, our country shouldn't be run as a subsidiary of Rome. Their concern was not so much of a cultural concern, as a political concern. While the political reinforcement of a cultural theme (such as Christmas) will likely strengthen the force of that theme within the culture, it will fail, in even its most forceful expression, to trample upon the rights of those who do not find refuge in theme. If we would say to our citizens, "you must decorate your house with Christmas lights or you will become a Christmas light", that would be a violation of the seperation of church and state. However, on the other hand, if we would even say to our citizens, "Please drive safely this Christmas," all we're doing is giving them some practical advice while reinforcing a cultural theme.
Now, you may ask, what is the speak of Babel? Isn't that a Bible story? And who are you to quote the Bible, you might hurt someone's feelings. My answer is that you're probably a dumb peice of shit stripped of your cultural heritage by parents overly caught up in the movement of pluralistic relativism. The primary role of holidays like Christmas, Halloween, and Martin Luther King Jr. day, as well as cultural themes such as the English language, capitalism, and even yellow school buses, is to provide a common set of beliefs and assumptions which unite the culture of which they're a part. I may not speak the English language in my home, but if I hope to communicate with other Americans I need to recourse to this shared set of tropes. Relativistic pluralism, secular humanistic theory, and those damn hippies have helped create a culture which is defined solely by its refusal to recognize this shared cultural themes. They destroy the platform which allows to communicate equally. Ebonics, for instance, creates two distinct sets of people in America: people who speak Ebonics and people who speak queen's bloody English. Their connection is severed and communication is that much more difficult between each camp. These movements are doing their best to destroy every single peice of culture which unites Americans in order that noone's feelings should be bloody hurt.
Fuck them.
Continue on this path and real, emphatic communication will be all but impossible. Our tower to God through "democracy" and "freedom" will be all but shattered, let to suffer the fate of Ozymandias, lying in the desert created by global warming.
Whacko Christian right wingers... I'm with you on this one.
Silly Scientists, Interpretting Your Results in For Grown-Ups
CNN.com - 2004 among hottest on record - Dec 16, 2004
The supporters of the global warming hypothesis are quite excited to add another peice of evidence to their side of the table as they find 2004 to be the hottest year on record, "extending a trend since 1990 that has registered the 10 warmest years." Of course, that information ins coming from U.N. environmental figures, and I think you'd agree with me in the fact that the U.N. is playing politics as usual. I'm gonna have to agree with the President on this one, more studies need to be done to determine if global warming is real. As far as I'm concerned, hotter weather, melting ice caps, rising ocean levels, rampant draughts, more severe and frequent hurricanes and typhoons, and randomly changing weather patterns offer no conclusive proof that global warming is somehow a real phenomenon linked to our widespread burning of fossil fuels. It's kinda like Freud's superego... sure, you can take a bunch of properties and link them together under a common label, but does that label make it real? Are we only trying to link these events under some maleficent "global warming," when in all reality there is little or no link between them? Sure, it makes it simple, but is it correct? Without further studies designed solely with the purpose of refuting these claims, it would be silly to cut our burning of fossil fuels, especially in first-world highly developed countries where we would all be terribly inconvienced if we did so.
The supporters of the global warming hypothesis are quite excited to add another peice of evidence to their side of the table as they find 2004 to be the hottest year on record, "extending a trend since 1990 that has registered the 10 warmest years." Of course, that information ins coming from U.N. environmental figures, and I think you'd agree with me in the fact that the U.N. is playing politics as usual. I'm gonna have to agree with the President on this one, more studies need to be done to determine if global warming is real. As far as I'm concerned, hotter weather, melting ice caps, rising ocean levels, rampant draughts, more severe and frequent hurricanes and typhoons, and randomly changing weather patterns offer no conclusive proof that global warming is somehow a real phenomenon linked to our widespread burning of fossil fuels. It's kinda like Freud's superego... sure, you can take a bunch of properties and link them together under a common label, but does that label make it real? Are we only trying to link these events under some maleficent "global warming," when in all reality there is little or no link between them? Sure, it makes it simple, but is it correct? Without further studies designed solely with the purpose of refuting these claims, it would be silly to cut our burning of fossil fuels, especially in first-world highly developed countries where we would all be terribly inconvienced if we did so.
15.12.04
Everyone's Favorite: The Neo-Cons!
The New Republic Online: Identity Crisis
Finally victorious in their quest for policy power in Washington, our respectable Neo-Conservative Cabal seems to be afloat without cohesion. Their vision of using America's superior military force, while quite effective against a castrated little guy, runs into some major practical problems when confronted with a very potent foe who will likely be holding a nuclear weapon within five years. Iran is positioning itself expertly, and the Neo-Cons have no clear response. With Iraq a mess, is the world suddenly getting a little too complicated for the one dimensional thinking of the Cro-Magnonic foreign policy wise men?
Finally victorious in their quest for policy power in Washington, our respectable Neo-Conservative Cabal seems to be afloat without cohesion. Their vision of using America's superior military force, while quite effective against a castrated little guy, runs into some major practical problems when confronted with a very potent foe who will likely be holding a nuclear weapon within five years. Iran is positioning itself expertly, and the Neo-Cons have no clear response. With Iraq a mess, is the world suddenly getting a little too complicated for the one dimensional thinking of the Cro-Magnonic foreign policy wise men?
Iraq's Oil Irregularities
Aljazeera.Net - Watchdog: Fraud in Iraq oil sales
I'm sure you're well aware of the current investigations, some even led by U.S. Congressional committees, which are reviewing the Iraqi Oil for Food scandals. In fact, Norm Coleman, a Senator from MN willing to switch political parties for immeadiate gain (i.e. skeevy bastard), called for the resignation of Kofi Annan over the incident. A sentiment that was echoed NOWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD. Oddly enough, there are further irregularities popping up in the world of Iraqi oil; however, these have cropped up post-invasion. Now, I would never stoop to the level of saying that the United States government would cause a major fuss only when its not benefitting from the irregularties, cause that might be treasonous (And Lord knows I don't want to force my government to take full advantage of the Patriot Act and arrest me as a terrorist.), yet maybe, just maybe we should show some consistency and avoid setting double standards in one aspect of our dealings with the world.
I'm sure you're well aware of the current investigations, some even led by U.S. Congressional committees, which are reviewing the Iraqi Oil for Food scandals. In fact, Norm Coleman, a Senator from MN willing to switch political parties for immeadiate gain (i.e. skeevy bastard), called for the resignation of Kofi Annan over the incident. A sentiment that was echoed NOWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD. Oddly enough, there are further irregularities popping up in the world of Iraqi oil; however, these have cropped up post-invasion. Now, I would never stoop to the level of saying that the United States government would cause a major fuss only when its not benefitting from the irregularties, cause that might be treasonous (And Lord knows I don't want to force my government to take full advantage of the Patriot Act and arrest me as a terrorist.), yet maybe, just maybe we should show some consistency and avoid setting double standards in one aspect of our dealings with the world.
American News You Probably Haven't Heard
Aljazeera.Net - Castro, Chavez defy US trade pact
Those leftist tyrants are at it again. Castro, evil dictator Americana extrodinaire, and Chavez, newest member of the legally-elected-socialists-we-try-to-coup-out-of-office club, are once again operating behind the United States back. This time they seek to undermine United States attempts to impose a free trade agreement on the South and Central Americas by making their own free trade agreement. I suppose they don't understand that if the United States doesn't like what they're doing, they shouldn't very well be doing it. We're in charge of the treaties written and signed in this hemisphere.
Those leftist tyrants are at it again. Castro, evil dictator Americana extrodinaire, and Chavez, newest member of the legally-elected-socialists-we-try-to-coup-out-of-office club, are once again operating behind the United States back. This time they seek to undermine United States attempts to impose a free trade agreement on the South and Central Americas by making their own free trade agreement. I suppose they don't understand that if the United States doesn't like what they're doing, they shouldn't very well be doing it. We're in charge of the treaties written and signed in this hemisphere.
Missile Test.... FAILS!
CNN.com - U.S. missile defense test fails - Dec 15, 2004
BBC NEWS - Missile Defense Shield Test Fails
Due to an unknown anomaly (terrorism hasn't been ruled out), the missile protecting us from North Korean intercontinental ballastic missiles (yep people, they might have those 50 years down the road) failed in its efforts to get off the ground. Early, Missile Defense Agency officials said this test was not designed to test the accuracy of the missiles, apparently it wasn't designed to test their launching sequence either. On a positive note, the missiles waiting to be used succeeded in the sex appeal column, winning applause from all attending for their sleek and stylish design.
BBC NEWS - Missile Defense Shield Test Fails
Due to an unknown anomaly (terrorism hasn't been ruled out), the missile protecting us from North Korean intercontinental ballastic missiles (yep people, they might have those 50 years down the road) failed in its efforts to get off the ground. Early, Missile Defense Agency officials said this test was not designed to test the accuracy of the missiles, apparently it wasn't designed to test their launching sequence either. On a positive note, the missiles waiting to be used succeeded in the sex appeal column, winning applause from all attending for their sleek and stylish design.
13.12.04
Keeping it real, at home and abroad
Terrorism & Security | csmonitor.com
The CIA has been very busy recently. Not infiltrating terrorist cells, but the next best thing: monitoring the phone calls of the villainous Mohamed El Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Soon we will have hard evidence that this independent and effective mastermind behind the expert claims that Iraq didn't actually have weapons of mass destruction is in fact a terrorist sympathizer. There's conclusive proof that El Baradei has been talking extensively with those foreign devils in Iran, building ties which led by this evil man can only bode ill for the United States. We must stop this threat before he allows more countries (I'm looking at you remaing axis of evil) into duping us that they have weapons of mass destruction when they really don't.
The CIA has been very busy recently. Not infiltrating terrorist cells, but the next best thing: monitoring the phone calls of the villainous Mohamed El Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Soon we will have hard evidence that this independent and effective mastermind behind the expert claims that Iraq didn't actually have weapons of mass destruction is in fact a terrorist sympathizer. There's conclusive proof that El Baradei has been talking extensively with those foreign devils in Iran, building ties which led by this evil man can only bode ill for the United States. We must stop this threat before he allows more countries (I'm looking at you remaing axis of evil) into duping us that they have weapons of mass destruction when they really don't.
12.12.04
The KGB: Assasinations with Style
KGB legacy of poison politics | csmonitor.com
Compared to the assasination efforts by United States agencies, which tend to use bullets and exploding heads, its rather interesting to observe the outright style and slyness acheived by the KGB in the past and present.
Compared to the assasination efforts by United States agencies, which tend to use bullets and exploding heads, its rather interesting to observe the outright style and slyness acheived by the KGB in the past and present.
10.12.04
Soldier's question actually suggested by reporter... question therefore irrelevant
CNN.com - Editor: Disclosure was needed on armor query - Dec 10, 2004
Yes, journalism has reached a new peak of reliable coverage yesterday as it turns out the soldier who asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (known affectionately as Rummy): "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?" was actually coached by a reporter embedded in the unit to ask that question.
As our ethics faculty member at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Kelly McBride informs us about the ethical ramifications of it all... "I suspect some people would see it as manipulative... I suspect Rumsfeld felt manipulated."
Thank God CNN has released this timely report letting us know that they should have let us know about this in the first place. By focusing attention upon a question of ethics regarding the reporter, the reader is allowed to forget completely about the substantial practical policy issue confronting our troops and their lack of armor. For if the soldier didn't think of the question himself, does he really care about the issue? Perhaps the journalist also coached the rest of the division into cheering when the question was posed? Maybe the journalist is really sympathetic with the terrorists, and merely wants to bring troop morale down? These and other questions must be answered before debate can really begin on the issue of sending troops into the line of fire without adequate armor.
On a side note, I personally think the journalist in question needs to be reprimanded severely if not fired outright. Manipulating our government officials into questions which they aren't prepared to answer is a dishonest and unprofessional thing to do. Journalism, and media in general, was created as a large scale outlet to inform the public what the government wants the public to know, not as some crazy left wing institution responsible for objectively assessing what's going on and why it's going on in our government and world.
Yes, journalism has reached a new peak of reliable coverage yesterday as it turns out the soldier who asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (known affectionately as Rummy): "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?" was actually coached by a reporter embedded in the unit to ask that question.
As our ethics faculty member at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Kelly McBride informs us about the ethical ramifications of it all... "I suspect some people would see it as manipulative... I suspect Rumsfeld felt manipulated."
Thank God CNN has released this timely report letting us know that they should have let us know about this in the first place. By focusing attention upon a question of ethics regarding the reporter, the reader is allowed to forget completely about the substantial practical policy issue confronting our troops and their lack of armor. For if the soldier didn't think of the question himself, does he really care about the issue? Perhaps the journalist also coached the rest of the division into cheering when the question was posed? Maybe the journalist is really sympathetic with the terrorists, and merely wants to bring troop morale down? These and other questions must be answered before debate can really begin on the issue of sending troops into the line of fire without adequate armor.
On a side note, I personally think the journalist in question needs to be reprimanded severely if not fired outright. Manipulating our government officials into questions which they aren't prepared to answer is a dishonest and unprofessional thing to do. Journalism, and media in general, was created as a large scale outlet to inform the public what the government wants the public to know, not as some crazy left wing institution responsible for objectively assessing what's going on and why it's going on in our government and world.
9.12.04
Terrorism & Security | csmonitor.com
Terrorism & Security csmonitor.com
When you and your adversary feel like a war at the present just wouldn't be bloody enough, look no further than the United States for all your advanced weapons needs. Guaranteed to turn a low intensity engagement into high intensity excitement.
Disclaimer: Upon wars end aforementioned parties must agree to incinerate evidence of previous U.S support and arms sales (see: Iraq - Saddam Hussein, and Afghanistan - Osama bin Laden)
When you and your adversary feel like a war at the present just wouldn't be bloody enough, look no further than the United States for all your advanced weapons needs. Guaranteed to turn a low intensity engagement into high intensity excitement.
Disclaimer: Upon wars end aforementioned parties must agree to incinerate evidence of previous U.S support and arms sales (see: Iraq - Saddam Hussein, and Afghanistan - Osama bin Laden)
Missile Defense Shield (status: unknown)
The military planned to conduct the first full flight test of its national missile defense system in nearly two years, with the test coming possibly as early as Wednesday evening.
Weather conditions at an Alaska launch site would determine when the test will go forward, said Rick Lehner, a spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency.
Because the launches will test several new aspects of the missile defense system, Lehner said the interceptor actually shooting down the target is not a primary goal of the mission.-CNN
Weather conditions permitting, we'll find out if our $9.5 billion a year ($200 billion total) missile defense shield is capable of not shooting down a ballastic missile. Bravo.
Weather conditions at an Alaska launch site would determine when the test will go forward, said Rick Lehner, a spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency.
Because the launches will test several new aspects of the missile defense system, Lehner said the interceptor actually shooting down the target is not a primary goal of the mission.-CNN
Weather conditions permitting, we'll find out if our $9.5 billion a year ($200 billion total) missile defense shield is capable of not shooting down a ballastic missile. Bravo.
Forgive My Imprudence
Our soldier's are "bent" but not yet "broken." Our allies, besides Isreal, are with us for the money or simply tradition's sake. The world despises us. We press forward with more propositions the world despises every day (missile defense, attack Iran/Syria/etc., anti-Kyoto). Our environment is nearing breaking point. Global warming's effects are soon to peak, as documented by our own Pentagon (by way of leak). The corporate platform our country is built upon is crumbling from the immoral characters which support it. Our people are united by nothing except for an ideology of individualism and a desire for the newest Lexus. United States nationalism has been watered down into "patriotic" support of current government doctrine or an undefined conception of freedoms based on an unread constitution. Our leaders are corporate puppets, Armageddon awaiting Christians, and spineless, poll driven Yuppies. Democracy has been transformed into a marketing contest, yet another failed institution. Our economic system, based on the principles of perpetual growth, is beginning to realize its limits as the dollar falls, job creation stalls, and terrorists threaten shopping malls. Freedom has been transformed from a reality into an ideology, merely paid lip service in our freedom to choose a red, blue, or green cell phone. Journalism, the institution responsible for keeping these things in check by keeping the public aware, has gladly joined this vast conspiracy in exchange for an exclusive interview and higher ratings.
But, for the sake of our sanity, let's just pretend none of this is happening. Let's get ourselves degrees, a chummy internship, and a stable salary. Let's build our home in a gated community and let bygones be bygones. After all "we create our own realities," no? So please, dismiss what I just said as the ravings of a lunatic. I'm not all that concerned with your individual happiness, so why listen to me? Go watch some television, and reassure yourself that with the newest pair of Nikes (now available in 8 different styles) you will be the coolest kid on the block.
Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.
Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight.
Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.
But, for the sake of our sanity, let's just pretend none of this is happening. Let's get ourselves degrees, a chummy internship, and a stable salary. Let's build our home in a gated community and let bygones be bygones. After all "we create our own realities," no? So please, dismiss what I just said as the ravings of a lunatic. I'm not all that concerned with your individual happiness, so why listen to me? Go watch some television, and reassure yourself that with the newest pair of Nikes (now available in 8 different styles) you will be the coolest kid on the block.
Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.
Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight.
Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)